Global comparison

Compare futures brokers

Listed futures need a broker that can connect to the exchange and a margin system that can call you for cash. This page names firms that publish that capability somewhere in their group. It does not say the contract you want is enabled, or that the margin schedule is attractive.

Interactive Brokers and Schwab, through its futures affiliate and thinkorswim, are the clearest names in the current register. Other firms may offer CFDs on futures prices; those firms are not added here just because an index CFD exists. Tick value, expiry and intraday margin are Not confirmed and dominate the economics more than a headline commission.

How to read this table

Providers appear because their published business overlaps this category in at least one country. That is an editorial classification, not a statement that the product is open to you. Fees, minimum deposits and several product details are shown as Not confirmed until they are taken from the entity that would hold the account. The table sorts by name. WiT Markets does not publish a hidden score.

What WiT Markets will not do here

  • Name a provider of the year, a house favourite, or a default choice.
  • Copy another country’s fee card into this one.
  • Treat an affiliate programme, if one existed, as a reason to include or order a firm. No commercial relationship is active in this data.

Fee, FX and minimum-deposit sorts stay off until those figures are sourced. Capability filters for options, futures, fractional shares and similar fields stay off for the same reason. Nothing here is ordered as best.

Providers in this category

Providers in this category
ProviderEditorial fitTypeRegulationAvailabilityFees
Charles SchwabUS investors who want a full-service discount brokerUS brokerDepends on countrySee country pagesNot confirmed
Interactive BrokersActive multi-market investorsMulti-asset brokerDepends on countrySee country pagesNot confirmed
SaxoMulti-asset investors who want one platformMulti-asset brokerDepends on countrySee country pagesNot confirmed

Charles Schwab

Editorial fit: US investors who want a full-service discount broker

Fees: Not confirmed

Platform: Schwab.com, the Schwab mobile app and thinkorswim.

Regulation: Depends on country

Availability: See country pages

View details

Interactive Brokers

Editorial fit: Active multi-market investors

Fees: Not confirmed

Platform: Client Portal, Trader Workstation and IBKR Mobile are published platform names. Feature sets by entity are not confirmed here.

Regulation: Depends on country

Availability: See country pages

View details

Saxo

Editorial fit: Multi-asset investors who want one platform

Fees: Not confirmed

Platform: SaxoInvestor and SaxoTrader are published product names. Availability by country is not confirmed here.

Regulation: Depends on country

Availability: See country pages

View details

Related

Sources and review

Written by: WiT Markets Editorial. Writes and structures WiT Markets pages. Separates a sourced fact from a cell that is Not confirmed.

Review: Editorially reviewed. This is not a qualified specialist review and it is not a legal sign-off.

Last reviewed: . Next review due . The date is an editorial pass. It is not a live check of every third-party fee.

Regulatory and official sources

Other sources

Methodology. Editorial policy. Corrections. Report an error.

Compare futures brokers | WiT Markets